Thursday, October 24, 2013

The Walking Dead TV Series Analysis (Rough Draft)



A television show series that has for a while been of my interest is “The Walking Dead.” Based off of the 2003 black and white comic book series  “The Walking Dead” by the author Robert Kirkman, Tony Moore, and Charlie Adlard, this tv series has gained excellent ratings since its first premiered on on October 31, 2010 cable AMC channel. This television series revolves around the plot of events occurring after a zombie apocalypse has occurred. The interesting thing that sets apart this  tv series from any ordinary zombie apocalypse movie or other show is because instead of focusing only on the main idea of survival against the large hoards of zombies, “The Walking Dead” TV series focuses on the elements of emotions and relations.

                                           Originally rated for the viewers to be “TV-14,” the demographics for the audience is “18-49” year olds.  The targeted audience of “The Walking Dead” series can be basically anyone who enjoys zombie flicks or, as a matter of fact, it can be for anyone who enjoys gore.

                                           Analyzing particular episodes and analyzing characters within this series, you can get a better idea of the values or beliefs that this series wants to present. In the first season of the series you find a redneck character named Merle. Merle is seen as a very tough character in this series. We see him being this figure who “doesn’t beg” in front of anyone or in fact even God. In a particular episode, when chained on top of the rooftop, Merle takes the situation into his own hands and saws off his own hand in order to survive from the zombies that were coming towards him. He has this hard shelled personality in him that seeks no help from mankind or God. Further into the series, Merle had also become a villain. Despite Merle being portrayed as someone who was a “bad guy” from the start; by going on a suicide mission in order to kill the Governer, Merle proved the thory that even a bad guy can become a good guy at the end. This character appeals to the audiences who have also had a rough childhood and feel helpless to their own situation. They can change for the better.

                                           Another concept that “The Walking Dead” series examines is the concept of racism. This again is seen through the character of Merle. In the first season, we see T-Dog, the sole African American character in the majority surviving group of white people.  Merle in particular detests T-Dog because he is not white.  The concept of racism is seen when Merle constantly makes T-Dog feel inferior by ordering him around and using the term “nigger.” Later , when T-Dog and Merle got into an argument, you see Merle beat T-Dog and spit on his face. Rick then takes control of the situation by cuffing Merle to the rooftop telling T-Dog to watch over him. When the sudden outbreak of zombies is released and everyone was trying to escape, despite Merle’s attitude towards T-Dog, T-Dog attempted to save Merle. This shows the value that despite the racism that Merle showed towards T-Dog, there was still humanity in him to attempt to save Merle.

                                           The values in the Walking Dead surface when you start to looks into the relationships of the survivors during the crisis of the zombie apocalypse. A particular relation that spawned from the series was of Carol’s. She represents the figure of a perfect wife. Her husband Ed, is a individual who likes to have authority. Carol’s marriage with Ed gives him the authority he wants by him constantly pushing around Carol. For instance, there was this one episode, where Carol was washing the laundry with other two female characters of the series and when she began to open up and joke around with the other two females. This catches Ed’s attention and he tells the ladies to stop conversing and wash the laundry properly. This upsets one of the females who reacts by talking back to Ed. This angers Ed and he tells Carol to come with him. When Carol refuses to do so, this in effect leads to Ed slapping Carol on the face. The by standing character Shayne in response, starts to beat up Ed for his behavior. At the end, Carol still tends to her beaten husband. Throughout the series, you notice that the relation between Ed and Carol is abusive. Regardless the abuse, she still cares for him. In the series, we see Carol cowering in front of Ed but once Ed had died she became more of a braver woman who could stand her ground. The relation with Ed was limiting her and she became a victim of battered wife syndrome. She was so dependent on her husband, that she became entirely submissive.  This uncovers the belief that woman have when they stay in an abusive relation. They think that the abusive husband will change when in fact the woman has changed herself.

3 comments:

  1. Why are zombies and realistic apocalyptic shows popular right now? What in our society is making this survivalist genre relatable right now?
    Why is it important that this show focuses on emotions and relationships in addition to survival? Is pathos always popular, or is our society especially inclined toward emotional stories? Why?
    What does Merle’s ability to change from being a villain to being a good guy say about society’s treatment of “the gray area”? Is Merle’s rejection of help depicted as a positive or negative quality? What does the cultural myth presented in the show say about our society—do we value independence or prefer cooperation? What does Merle’s racism say about racism in our society? Is it a non-issue at this point, or is racism something that people find distasteful but generally ignore until it escalates to violence?
    How is Carol a “perfect” wife if she allows the abusive relationship to continue? Does our society really value female submission that much?! What other gender roles are depicted in the show; do they reinforce or reject cultural norms?
    Overall, your analysis is good. Just work on connecting your examples from the show to the values of our society as a whole. What do these things reveal about the culture of America in 2013?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Mara, for example, when you talk about Ed and Carol's relationship, keep in mind that Shane totally messed up Ed's face for treating the women the way he did. connect that to the change of morals of society. in the apocalypse even the old ways of treating women is dying out. Proving that as time changes morals and values change and even in a dying place, we can still learn to better ourselves and not stoop to primitive levels in order to interact with one another and survive. your analysis is pretty good, and i see a lot of potential if you can tie everything together to prove something about society/pop culture

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your analysis is really good so far. I especially like how you talked about Merle and T-Dog’s relationship and how T-Dog wanted to help Merle from becoming the walkers’ next meal. Also, even Daryl saw the change in Merle at the end of season three when going on the suicide mission. It made him see that his older brother was only looking after people even though he was never there growing up as a child. In your analysis maybe you can add how the Governor’s perspective changed from the beginning to end of his character. In addition, maybe you can talk about how Carol has evolved from being in an abusive relationship with Ed to now in the fourth season. She’s a much stronger woman now that she’s even taken it upon herself to teach the children in the prison how to use a knife.

    ReplyDelete